Young People Delayed In Federal Climate Suit, But They’d Rather Be In Court
Listen
The 21 young people who are suing the federal government over climate change are waiting for an appeals court to rule on whether their case can go forward. February 5 would have been their first day in Eugene Federal Court in the lawsuit.
After she ruled against the government’s attempts to dismiss the case, Eugene federal district judge Ann Aiken had set Monday as the start date for Juliana vs. The United States of America. The suit claims the federal government has enabled the fossil fuel industry to thrive and ignored its role in climate change.
But, the lawsuit’s future is in the hands of a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In December, they heard the Trump Administration’s arguments for a writ of mandamus, a rarely used legal maneuver that would invalidate Aiken’s decision. The youth plaintiffs aged 8 to 21, are taking to social media with the #IdRatherBeInCourt. Attorneys for the plaintiffs are hopeful the appeals court will allow the lawsuit to go to trial as soon as this summer.
Copyright 2018 KLCC
Related Stories:
Klickitat County Planning Commission mulls new solar, battery rules
One county in south-central Washington state has become a hub for renewable energy development. It’s divided people living in Klickitat County – those who welcome development and those who steadfastly oppose it.
‘A tale of two fires,’ how the 2024 Retreat Fire impacted the landscape near Yakima
The 2024 Retreat Fire is a tale of two fires. One side of the fire torched cliff sides and an important irrigation canal. In another spot, the forest is a mosaic of burn severity, the sign of a “good fire.”
How NASA satellites help researchers better understand NW river temperatures
Sockeye salmon like these are among the salmon species in peril in hot water. (Courtesy: Aaron Kunz) Listen (Runtime 0:59) Read When waters get too warm, they can harm or
